Skip to content
All articles

Prognostic analysis of tissue-free versus tumor-informed ctDNA assays for molecular residual disease detection in early TNBC

Prof. Nicholas Turner
Prof. Nicholas Turner

Information on molecular residual disease (MRD) status could be important for selection of adjuvant therapy. Tissue-free assays not requiring sequencing of the primary tumormay simplify workflow if they offer accuracy similar to that of tumor-informed assays. A multicenter analysis of patients with early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) at high risk of recurrence evaluated tissue-free ctDNA analysis and compared tissue-free with tumor-informed assay results. Plasma samples were collected every 3 months for up to 2 years after the completion of adjuvant therapy. The analysis included 1026 plasma samples from 159 patients. The tissue-free assay detected ctDNA in 54 patients (34.0%), with detection strongly associated with risk of recurrence (HR 27.2; p<0.001). Among patients with ctDNA detected by both the tissue-free assay and digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR; n=42), tissue-free detection occurred at an earlier time point in 14 patients (33.3%); in none of the patients dPCR detection occurred before tissue-free detection. Median lead time to recurrence was 7.9 months for tissue-free versus 5.8 months for dPCR (HR 0.57; p=0.03). Concordance between tissue-free and multivariant tumor-informed assays was good. Among patients detected by both assays, 29.3% had ctDNA detected earlier by multivariant tumor-informed assay with 2.4% earlier by the tissue-free assay. Median lead times to recurrence were 7.6 months with tissue-free and 7.1 months with tumor-informed assay (p=0.15). The authors conclude that in this prognostic study, tissue-free ctDNA detection was prognostic for recurrence in patients with TNBC.

Original publicationjamanetwork.com
Read the publication